![]() That said, the color and contrast is excellent, and I like the overall look. However, there is an odd halo around my head, and the edge recognition is very sharp, making the photo look a little unrealistic. It’s very sharp, the background is blurred just enough, and it hasn’t added any beauty effects without me asking. The One Vision also washes out the scene, and the blur effect is messy around the top of my head. It also over exposes the background, but gets the color of my t-shirt right. I used portrait mode on all four phones here, but the Xperia didn’t really blur the background at all, and instead used a much more aggressive beauty effect to smooth out my skin. The Sony required me to get in close, while I could step back and take a wider shot with the Honor 20, resulting in a more cohesive image. The Honor 20 is also excellent here, with the dedicated Aperture mode rather than just a portrait mode helping it create and atmospheric photo. In reality, the color was probably in-between it and the Honor 20’s photo. The blur is just right, the edge recognition is good, and the color is accurate. However, the bokeh effect is pronounced, and it did so using only one camera lens. ![]() The Pixel 3a is wonderfully detailed - just look at that wood grain - but gets confused with the blur around the window frame, ruining the look of the photo. The One Vision didn’t get the color right, returning a very different shade of green from the others (and real life), and also got confused with the blur around the door edges. I used the portrait and aperture mode to take this photo. Winner: Draw between Pixel 3a and Honor 20 Seaside The Honor 20’s brightness reveals more detail in certain areas, but the overexposure of the sky is distracting. However, the Pixel’s 3a’s handling of the sky is superb, adding real atmosphere that was representative of the time of day. The Pixel 3a also makes the ground grey, compared to the more realistic color in the Honor 20’s photo. It’s a tough choice between the Honor 20 and Pixel 3a’s pictures, and I really like both examples. Although the photo is good, the color of the sand and pebbles is too grey, making the end result a little lifeless. The image is too dull, with an overly blue tint, and less than natural colors. ![]() The Xperia 10 Plus’s shot is the most accurate photo, in terms of the lighting conditions at the the time, but this does not make it the best example. This picture of a beach-side fisherman’s house was taken close to dusk, but without night mode on any of the phones. That’s often all the chance we have, especially on vacation, so each camera needs to work perfectly every time. I did not take multiple shots either: One with each camera, in each situation. Much of this will be subjective, but I’ve aimed to find the shot which is the most shareable, as this is a large reason we all take photos in the first place.Īll photos were taken in auto mode, aside from tapping to select an area of focus in certain situations, or using a low-light mode or portrait mode. I’ve picked the winners based on which images look “best” and the most technically impressive to my eye. I have not subjected these photos to an in-depth, scientific comparison. Like the One Vision, it’s also not sold in the U.S. Honor’s software suite includes a Night mode, various bokeh modes, and lots of AI features for scene recognition and more. The wide-angle lens has 16-megapixels, and the depth lens has 2-megapixels. Like the One Vision, the main camera has 48 megapixels and an f/1.8 aperture. It does have a special feature to take pictures in 21:9 aspect ratio to match its screen.įinally, the 400 pound ($505) Honor 20 has three camera lenses, and is the only one in our test that can take wide-angle shots. Unlike the other phones, it does not have a night mode. The main lens has 12 megapixels and an f/1.75 aperture, while the second lens has 8 megapixels and an f/2.4 aperture. The $430 (350 British pounds) Sony Xperia 10 Plus also has a dual-lens camera. Software enhances low-light photos with Night Vision mode, and there’s a second 5-megapixel camera to add depth to bokeh images. It uses quad-pixel technology to combine its pixels into one, single 12-megapixel shot for maximum light sensitivity. The main camera has 48-megapixels with an f/1.7 aperture and optical image stabilization. Motorola has put two lenses on the back of the 270 British pound ($300) One Vision. The $400 (400 British pounds) Google Pixel 3a has the same 12.2-megapixel single-lens camera on it as the full-price Pixel 3, complete with optical and electronic stabilization, an f/1.8 aperture, and all the artificial intelligence features including Night Sight (though it is missing the Visual Core chip for faster image processing).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |